Using this method I found that the dimension of this image is 1.767, which is similar to a hexaflake. As you can see I did not compare this result to the box counting method, because I was unsure about the function of "image size _> 2^10".
I thought it would be worthwhile to analyze different sections of the same picture to see if the dimension would change, so I looked at the left side and the right side separately. Using the same method as above, "which I am still unsure of", I found that the
dim(Left)=1.767
and
dim(Right)= 1.77
.
So is the left side of the image more like the whole image, than the right? If anyone knows how to break up an image into smaller squares and run them through this code to find the dimension that would be awesome!
Comments
Using the code provided by Mark on stackexchange
Using this method I found that the dimension of this image is 1.767, which is similar to a hexaflake. As you can see I did not compare this result to the box counting method, because I was unsure about the function of "image size _> 2^10".
I thought it would be worthwhile to analyze different sections of the same picture to see if the dimension would change, so I looked at the left side and the right side separately. Using the same method as above, "which I am still unsure of", I found that the
dim(Left)=1.767
anddim(Right)= 1.77
.So is the left side of the image more like the whole image, than the right? If anyone knows how to break up an image into smaller squares and run them through this code to find the dimension that would be awesome!