@Student26 said:
is it ok to generalize the solution to:
$$N(A) = \left ( \begin{matrix}
-2\\
0\\
1\\
\end{matrix} \right ) $$
or to:
$$N(A) = \left ( \begin{matrix}
-2x\\
0x\\
1x\\
\end{matrix} \right ) $$
?
Well, the first one is definitely not correct - it's just a single vector, rather than an infinite set of vectors. We will learn soon (this week, in fact) about the span of a set of vectors and we might then answer this question as the span of the set containing that one vector.
The second one looks a bit better but I still don't think that it's clearly indicated that there is is a set of vectors there.
Comments
$$
A = \left ( \begin{matrix}
1 & 0 & 2\\
0 & 1 & 0\\
\end{matrix} \right )
$$
$$\mathcal{N}(A) = \left \{ \begin{bmatrix} -2x_3 \\ 0 \\ x_3 \end{bmatrix} \middle| \, x_3 \in \mathbb{C} \right \}$$
is it ok to generalize the solution to:
$$N(A) = \left ( \begin{matrix}
-2\\
0\\
1\\
\end{matrix} \right ) $$
or to:
$$N(A) = \left ( \begin{matrix}
-2x\\
0x\\
1x\\
\end{matrix} \right ) $$
?
Well, the first one is definitely not correct - it's just a single vector, rather than an infinite set of vectors. We will learn soon (this week, in fact) about the span of a set of vectors and we might then answer this question as the span of the set containing that one vector.
The second one looks a bit better but I still don't think that it's clearly indicated that there is is a set of vectors there.