Revision history [back]

I think that it's possible we could see a component-wise proof on the gradient, such as the one we saw on the worksheet today. There's really a lot of possibilities with that; abstract stuff and cases with specific functions. I think that I want to be fully comfortable with doing any component-wise proof with the gradient for tomorrow.

I think that it's possible we could see a component-wise proof on the gradient, such as the one we saw on the worksheet today. (Show that $ \nabla \left[ \sin(f(x,y))\right] = \cos(f(x,y)) \nabla \left[f(x,y)\right]$.)

There's really a lot of possibilities with that; abstract stuff and cases with specific functions. I think that I want to be fully comfortable with doing any component-wise proof with the gradient for tomorrow.

I think that it's possible we could see a component-wise proof on the gradient, such as the one we saw on the worksheet today. (Show that $ \nabla \left[ \sin(f(x,y))\right] = \cos(f(x,y)) \nabla \left[f(x,y)\right]$.)

There's really a lot of possibilities with that; abstract stuff and cases with specific functions. I think that I want to be fully comfortable with doing any component-wise proof with the gradient for tomorrow.

I think that it's possible we could see a component-wise proof on the gradient, such as the one we saw on the worksheet today. (Show that $ \nabla \left[ \sin(f(x,y))\right] = \cos(f(x,y)) \nabla \left[f(x,y)\right]$.)

There's really a lot of possibilities with that; abstract stuff and cases with specific functions. I think that I want to be fully comfortable with doing any component-wise proof with the gradient for tomorrow.